The Archivist
4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC

The paranoia about any sort of directing central force in a society almost defines American politics. The…

The paranoia about any sort of directing central force in a society almost defines American politics. The founding mythology of ‘the people’ ruling themselves, what Graeber and Sahlins called the contradictory notion of popular sovereignty. /1 https://t.co/miuFjZfArv https://t.co/NPXjBWevvV
Image attached to this post
Post 2 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
One of my constant themes here is to reject not only the notion of popular sovereignty, but more fundamentally the idea of ‘the people’ itself. That idea is destroying democracy. It’s a ludicrous fantasy. /2
Post 3 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
Humans don’t act as groups, at any size of group, from a soccer club or committee, through to a nation State or the UN. It’s not physically or even logically possible for them to act in that way. We don’t think enough about how ridiculous the idea is. /3
Post 4 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
That somehow groups of people act as a single will, a single group mind, called ‘the people’. Humans are SOCIAL creatures. and sociality itself is intrinsically and intensely hierarchical. It’s driven by status, the atomic root of all human life. /4
Post 5 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
Yes humans form groups, collectives, but these are not a level or flat structure, they’re hierarchies of status. Members of the groups engage in rampant imitation, of each other and of higher status members. Imitative rivalry is status rivalry. /5
Post 6 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
Humans copy. That’s all human life. And they copy to gain status, because to have status is to have an identity. To be somebody, rather than nobody. We’re not driven by status out of vanity or a lust for power. But as social animals, to be something, rather than nothing. /6
Post 7 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
To go back to this modern American paranoid obsession with the avoidance of any ‘authoritarian’ impulse. To label any sense of people being led or shaped by individuals as ‘fascism’. This to me anyway is more a symptom of the sick and failed idea of democracy, in America. /7 https://t.co/bpbK3u5S9A
Image attached to this post
Post 8 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
Totally out of kilter with the reality of humans and how they associate. We’ve seen multiple analyses of the ideas of Yarvin recently, and an entire industry focused on plotting Trump’s apparently fascist takeover of America. The vanity of it, for starters. /8 https://t.co/8tXNNyZknO
Image attached to this post
Post 9 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
The idea that humans just install some sort of regime, like they’re installing an operating system on a computer. Not one pause to reflect on whether there are certain immutable characteristics of humanity itself that may drive how our societies operate. /9
Post 10 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
People who follow me know that I believe, following the work of many scholars, that a sort of feudalism, topped by a King-like figure, is THE default state of human societies. It’s the model humans will create and recreate, always, just with different names for things. /10
Post 11 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
So this idea that Yarvin and his followers for example might impose a monarchy on the US is just nonsense to me. The people of the US are appointing their own king. That’s why we have Trump. They were sick of the idiocy of ‘the people’ ideas. /11
Post 12 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
Ancient Rome flirted with ‘the people’, with its Senate-driven republican process. It filled the streets with endless rivers of blood. It was only when replaced by emperors under the Pax Romana that relative peace returned. /12
Post 13 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
Not because this or that person imposed this structure on the Romans. It was the natural evolution of their collective life. Gabriel Tarde once called democracy a pause between two aristocracies. Meaning the same thing, a brief pseudo-levelling, between two hierarchies. /13
Post 14 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
A transition between hierarchies, rather than any sort of sustainable model in itself. And the most modern, complex democracies are intrinsically, deeply hierarchical. Voting deludes us into thinking otherwise. /14
Post 15 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
Remember that voting merely gives people an option to choose which people will serve on the highest rungs of the *existing hierarchies*. Not to institute some impossible process of millions of people somehow running anything, as a group. /15
Post 16 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
It’s time to retire all of the cartoon Nazi and fascist memes and grow up. I come from a family who grew up literally under the Nazis. Fascism is just the desperate movement to restore kings, that happens automatically in every society. /16
Post 17 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
It creates Trumps, a useful idiot to our deepest anthropological behaviours. People want their kings back. They always will. Humans will always restore status hierarchies when they’re disrupted or broken. Often renaming the constituent parts so we miss the equivalence. /17
Post 18 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
We should see the American paranoia about fascism as more a symptom of their own dysfunctional ideas of what democracy actually is. ‘The people’ is a lethal myth. Evoked by tyrants throughout history, to rationalise their ascendancy. Hitler’s ‘volk’. /18
Post 19 of 19 · 4 June 2025 · 10:25 UTC
Democracy is a status hierarchy where status attaches to the satisfaction of collective need. It’s not and never will be ‘the people’ running anything. /end

← 2025 Threads · ← Back to June 2025