The Archivist
27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC

I see ‘enshittification’ as the inevitable creation of status hierarchies. Status is the currency of all…

I see ‘enshittification’ as the inevitable creation of status hierarchies. Status is the currency of all human life. There’s a very anti-trust thrust to Cory’s proposed solutions, which make status hierarchies in themselves the problem. I think that’s a mistake. /1 https://t.co/MKqLXViDZs
Post 2 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
A monopoly is really just a status hierarchy re-badged using modern economic words. Completely unsurprisingly, humans turn economic life into status hierarchies too. The solution is not more ‘competition’, to prevent status hierarchies from forming. /2
Post 3 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
That solution is within the same framing as the alleged problem. The ‘team sports’ or status games, just with more teams added to keep other teams in check. Team sports are not the solution for team sports. /3
Post 4 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
I’ve Tweeted a few times about how humans have historically tried to solve this. To prevent uncontrolled toxic status games. Will Storr’s wonderful book on status covers one brilliant solution, that created our modern world. To turn status games into ‘success games’. /4
Post 5 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
Or in other words, to make high status the work of collective engineering. That’s what the ‘Republic of Letters’ was about, that shift to science and engineering in the Victorian era. Where engineers and social reformers became high-status individuals and groups. /5
Post 6 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
The Victorians were obsessive about public ‘works’ or infrastructure. From the Queen down, it was the passion of that age. Because they found a way, accidentally, of making creating the collective good a high status activity. /6
Post 7 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
The Royal Society - it’s in the name. Engineering harnessed to status, let’s have that world back. The other much older way humans managed status games are things which modern humans find unpalatable. They don’t understand it. /7
Post 8 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
Humans created churches and monarchies. And governments. Using a modern lens these can only look like ‘authoritarian’, ‘undemocratic’ fairy tales. But we miss entirely what their real functional role was. /8
Post 9 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
These institutions were mostly about the regulation of status. About having a centralised master status hierarchy in a society, to regulate status throughout society itself. Modern thinkers glory in describing the abuses of these institutions. /9
Post 10 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
Missing entirely the violent chaos of life that preceded them. Like all institutions, they emerged from that chaos, as a counter to it. If you want to revel in anti-institutional life, move to Trump’s America right now. /10
Post 11 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
It was Edmund Burke who most famously argued the case for the centrality of institutions to human well-being. It used to be what conservatives stood for. Now they douse them with petrol and set fire to them. Institutions and regulation are the road to human well-being. /11
Post 12 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
Not competition. Yes competing teams will destroy dominant teams sometimes, which seems a victory. But the team sports continue unabated that way. You can’t stop status games with more status games. /12
Post 13 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
Unfortunately, the power of status is so absolute, all that allows the emergence of the institutions that control it is catastrophe. Most human institutions emerge when collective life has reached catastrophic outcomes. They emerge in the rebuilding. /13
Post 14 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
That’s our entire modern history, the 4 horsemen of the modern apocalypse in our times, in the first half of the 20th century. WW1, the Spanish Flu, The Great Depression and WW2. A carnival of catastrophe. Only this suppressed status games enough to force a re-orientation. /14
Post 15 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
That’s when the notion of a ‘public’ finally could emerge. A calculated construct required to rebuild societies, after WW2, at the tail-end of the carnival of catastrophe. Public institutions were formed and strengthened, to do the rebuilding. /15
Post 16 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
That period between roughly 1945 and the late-1970s was when those institutions ran our lives. The enormous surge in prosperity and health and general well-being came from those institutions running countries. /16
Post 17 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
When basics like public health and education and transport and other ‘public services’ were suddenly unquestioned central components of our lives. By the late-1970s life had become pretty good again. The carnival of catastrophe had receded from view. /17
Post 18 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
And so, the status games returned. Under cover of a new Trojan Horse, ‘the economy’. Market-based societies. Which when you strip away the economic mumbo jumbo, is really a society where status has free rein to do whatever it likes. /18
Post 19 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
Where regulating it becomes ‘anti-competitive’, obstructive of the free operation of a free market. Socially a total con, hidden in econo-bollocks. Really just a set of statistical indicators describing the current status quo. /19
Post 20 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
No politician dares challenge ‘the economy’. ‘It’s the economy, stupid’. No, stupid, the economy is stupid. It’s not a thing. It’s a con, to remove all public institutions and replace them with uncontrolled status games. Tor replace a public, with a market. /20
Post 21 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
The fictional idea that humans operate by all being allowed to freely do what they like, and the competition between them produces the best outcome. That’s not how humans ever behave. They overwhelmingly imitate one another, in games of imitative rivalry. /21
Post 22 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
In teams or groups. Thus ‘team sports’. Rene Girard saw this. The ‘free market’ was really clearing the field for uncontrolled imitative rivalry. Status was back, on steroids. Social media dramatically accelerates this shift. Team sports is its business model. /22
Post 23 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
As you look around at the lunacies of Trumpian politics, wondering what happened to our democracies, well…they never existed in the way we think they did. Our progress wasn’t due to decades of electing people. It was the legacy of the carnival of catastrophes. /23
Post 24 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
Now that legacy’s power has waned or more or less disappeared. It’s uncontrolled status games again, anything goes. “Meme it, and we will be it” (see next Tweet). Imitation (of status) is King, unleashed from all institutional checks and balances. /24
Post 25 of 25 · 27 February 2025 · 18:51 UTC
“Seemingly insignificant changes to the Culture, which can have outsized impact on altering the status hierarchy of daily life. We are living in an age of memetic power and memetic war. Meme it and we will be it.” Elizabeth Boyle. /end

← 2025 Threads · ← Back to February 2025