The Archivist
13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC

The genius of this show goes well beyond anybody’s issues with Jeremy Clarkson. It’s a brilliant window into…

The genius of this show goes well beyond anybody’s issues with Jeremy Clarkson. It’s a brilliant window into the limits of libertarian life, but also and at the same time its more regulated alternative. It’s a perpetual stalemate. Driven by forces that transcend both. /1 https://t.co/T9VYg2r8eB
Image attached to this post
Post 2 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
You come away from this show wondering how we all ever get food on our tables every day. Nobody anywhere in the world can make money, farming. That industry is dead. But we’re not even close to implementing an alternative. /2
Post 3 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
And what does that impossibility mean? Maybe it means that the team sports of our political views and our economic politics are not reaching the realities that sustain us. Our landscapes and the food we get from them. /3
Post 4 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
It’s not just that we don’t understand how to feed ourselves now. That’s a symptom. It’s that we have no idea *at all* how to live in our landscapes. How to shape them for the mutual benefit of ourselves and other living things. /4
Post 5 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
We have urban and regional suburbia, farms and national parks. None are models for coexisting with the landscape. We’re not grounded. Hypermobile travel cultures that treat geography as porn. Places to ‘see’, not inhabit. /5
Post 6 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
This is our specific toxic cultural disease. We’re still empires, we think imperially. We accumulate, everything. Including sights. We don’t form ongoing relationships with landscapes. /6
Post 7 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
Clarkson’s opponents in his county want to maintain a bucolic fantasy of English country life, divorced from any practical means of sustaining it. A landscape itself created from bucolic fantasy, post-WW2. /7 https://t.co/zOTNgMfBDV
Image attached to this post
Post 8 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
And Clarkson has no sustained appetite for the complexities of the same landscape. There is some movement on both sides, towards the other. But they’re playing team libertarian v team bucolic fantasy. Neither can win. /8 https://t.co/qejeGEIGlx
Image attached to this post
Post 9 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
Even the longest traditions of farming that survive in this landscape are basically just soil mining, unworkable without supply of fossil-fuel generated fertilisers. And climate change is a major character in this Shakespearean tragic-comedy, laughing at us. /9
Post 10 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
Flooding and scorching the same land. Crippling farming revenues along the way. We don’t understand how to live in actual relationship with a landscape any more. How to be ground-ed. /10
Post 11 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
Our survival depends on us re-learning that, very fast. And the odds are hugely against us pulling that off. Here in Australia we have the world champions at doing that. We recently voted loudly that we don’t get that. /11
Post 12 of 12 · 13 May 2024 · 07:05 UTC
A brilliant show. It only hints at these wider themes. But you can’t miss them. /end

← 2024 Threads · ← Back to May 2024