The Archivist
1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC

#auspol #covid19 a pandemic is a socio-political event rather than a biological event. For a given pathogen,…

#auspol #covid19 a pandemic is a socio-political event rather than a biological event. For a given pathogen, the spread of infection is entirely determined by the social and political arrangements it encounters. /1
Post 2 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
For this reason, all of the ways the pandemic has been described in biological terms can be more accurately re-cast in social and political terms. A thread exploring just some dimensions of this re-framing. /2
Post 3 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
Most generally, the idea that SARS-Cov-2 is something that invaded our 'normal' life is wrong. Its existence and then development and spread is intrinsic to what we call normal life. The landscape clearing for example which drove the zoonosis was our social/political creation. /3
Post 4 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
Once in our societies, varying amounts of mobility at all scales (local, regional, national, international) created the spread of infection, overlaid upon degrees of socio-economic disadvantage, which usually forced the poor to continue to work and become infected. /4
Post 5 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
A virus can't move on its own. People are its transport mechanism. All spread is therefore driven by these patterns of social and political organisation. If SARS-Cov-2 had emerged in a village separated from the rest of the world, it would have begun and ended there. /5
Post 6 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
To emphasise the political, the pandemic to date hasn't been a story of societies battling this particular virus. It's been the competition between various models of social and political life. Most generally an extreme libertarianism.../6
Post 7 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
...opposing just about all restriction on these existing patterns of social and political life. Up against a more traditional public health approach, recognising the need for collective effort to overcome the collective challenge. /7
Post 8 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
It's that libertarianism, most prominently seen in the US, UK and Brazil, which quickly led to mass infection and casualties. That set of political ideas frames societies as 'economies', and throughout there has been constant calls from these true believers.../8
Post 9 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
...to 'balance' public health action against economic damage. A clearly nonsensical, oxymoronic framing, when what they're calling the Economy is the socio-political arrangements actually creating the pandemic spread. Similarly, the idea of 'variants'. /9
Post 10 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
There are variants of SAR-Cov-2 at the biological level. However just as with the original appearance of the virus in Wuhan, these in turn were generated by specific socio-political conditions. Continuous spread, giving the virus access to fresh hosts to allow it to mutate. /10
Post 11 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
We can re-cast these variants therefore in socio-political terms. There have been several, perhaps beginning with education. At the start of the pandemic libertarians openly said children should continue in school, so parents could work. Naked economic self-interest. /11
Post 12 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
As resistance to this grew, this morphed into the variant that 'children's mental health and education will suffer if they miss school'. Said by people who previously had so little interest in education/children that they presided over decades of plummeting school outcomes. /12
Post 13 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
This mental health/education variant is virulent, and continues to this day. Perhaps next chronologically was the evolution of the 'live with the virus' variant. (Note I'm not trading in analogies here - these are literally the socio-political causes of these variants.) /13
Post 14 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
The 'live with the virus' variant has various sub-strains, such as minimisation of the apparent risk of SARS-Cov-2 - Trump's 'Kung Flu', and many describing it as 'just a flu'. A set of beliefs to encourage people to see the pandemic as typical, a standard flu season. /14
Post 15 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
Another sub-strain links back to the mental health idea, that action against the viral spread will irreparably damage all people's mental health. More recently the libertarians have adopted endemicity ideas, cloaking their 'just a flu' with the idea that the virus is.../15
Post 16 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
...already endemic, and we should just get back to normal life. Vaccines have now been cast as treatments against this (apparent) incursion of a virus into 'normal' life, and the sooner we all get the treatment, the faster normal life will be back. /16
Post 17 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
Which of course bring us back to the idea of the virus invading society, rather than society (the Economy) generating it. All of these socio-political variants are our true enemy in this pandemic, they create and prolong it. They will continue to mutate as needed. /17
Post 18 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
As we've seen with the same groups opposing climate change, continuously shifting their strategic framings to generate socio-political resistance to action. We need to ruthlessly deconstruct all of these framings, every time they appear. /18
Post 19 of 19 · 1 July 2021 · 20:53 UTC
Ultimately the pandemic is just one other symptom of our social and political arrangements, not some event that appeared out of nowhere, like an asteroid from space. It's the outcome of many decades of repeated reconstruction of societies along extreme libertarian lines. /end

← 2021 Threads · ← Back to July 2021