The Archivist

16 March

16 March · 01:07 UTC

More Stanley Fish. We listen way too much to scientists on these questions, and not to people from the humanities, who are usually orders of magnitude more sophisticated. "Religious thought may be vulnerable on any number of fronts, but it is not vulnerable to the criticism that in contrast to scientific or empirical thought, it rests on mere faith." https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/god-talk-part-2/comment-page-1/?_r=0

Nick Dee shared a link.