The Archivist

9 November

9 November · 20:09 UTC

You can look at this two ways. Regulators being cautious, as they're supposed to be. Or key members of these expert groups being culture warring, political operatives who have spent weeks attacking any sort of protection for children from Covid. Infecting children has become like a membership ritual for these operatives. They oppose masks in schools, school closures if there are infections, and remote learning. Doesn't matter what happens, they will find some new way to say 'kids must be at school', they've been doing it for 2 years. They're actually conservative politically, and conservatives want kids in school so parents can work. It's about the Economy. Time to cut through the BS spin. Major regulators like the FDA are fine with these vaccines. Covid has killed about 700 children in the US, and over 100 in the UK. Put that against the myocarditis and pericarditis risks select experts proclaim to be concerned about, with the vaccines. So far overwhelmingly mild, in children. One of these experts yesterday said that 'needle phobia' is another reason to hold off (I'm not making that up). Time to tell them to stop playing politics with childrens' lives. https://www.smh.com.au/national/australia-to-wait-for-data-from-us-children-before-clearing-vaccine-here-20211109-p597e2.html?fbclid=IwAR05-pE_E6Js37apVoN3-8rFIXulH7x_qMUu3_QhYNK-DqswLJrzF963uws

Nick Dee shared a link.