12 March

@[783412914:2048:Kyle Manning], @[100001374621876:2048:Michael Kato], we often discuss science and religion debates, and the nature of science itself. Would be very interested in your (and anybody else's) views on this two-part NY Times piece Stanley Fish wrote. Neither part is very long. Fish is a brilliant mind, and wonderful essayist. I can't emphasize enough how much so much of what he says here desperately needed to be said. Part 1: https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/citing-chapter-and-verse-which-scripture-is-the-right-one/ Part 2: https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/09/evidence-in-science-and-religion-part-two/